Бүтээлийн нэр
Are human rights violations a sufficient ethical justification for military intervention in a sovereign state?
Зохиогч
Хэлбэр
Нийтлэл
Салбар
Олон Улсын нийтийн эрх зүй
Бүтээлийн товч
My paper seeks to determine whether or not an invasion of sovereignty can ever be considered justifiable if the ultimate goal is to defend human rights. I will not favor or judge any state that has previously intervened in a sovereign state. However, in this paper, I argue that military intervention may be justified if we have a reasonable belief that our uninvited intervention will successfully prevent human rights violations, even though I will express my opinion in both ways. This work will be based solely on my ideological perspective and moral values, which will be strengthened by the theory studied by previous scholars.
Түлхүүр үг
military intervention, human rights, state sovereignty, ethics, international relations
Бичигдсэн огноо
2022-08-27
Хуудсын тоо
11
Хэл
Англи
Байршуулсан огноо
2022-09-30
Товч мэдээлэл үзсэн
2697
Бүрэн эхээр нь үзсэн
28
Эшлэлийн тоо
14
Санал болгож буй эшлэлийн загвар
Ba.Khulan “Are human rights violations a sufficient ethical justification for military intervention in a sovereign state?” (2022), ... дахь/дэх тал. Legaldata-аас унших боломжтой: https://legaldata.mn/b/1361
Цуглуулганд нэмэх
Бүтээлийг цуглуулгандaa нэмэхийн тулд нэвтэрсэн байх шаардлагатай.
Бүртгэлтэй бол нэвтрэх | Бүртгэлгүй бол бүртгүүлэх
Эшлэлүүд
  1. Alex Levitov (2015) ‘Human rights, self-determination, and external legitimacy’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 14(3), pp. 291–315.

  2. Baer, Helmut David, and Joseph E. Capizzi. (2006) “Just War Theory and the Problem of International Politics: On the Central Role of Just Intention.” Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 26, no. 1, pp. 163–175.

  3. Bas van der Vossen (2017) "A Presumption Against Intervention", Debating Humanitarian Intervention: Should We Try to Save Strangers?, Debating Ethics (New York, 2018; online edn, Oxford Academic), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190202903.003.0008 (accessed 25 Aug. 2022).

  4. Christopher Heath Wellman (2012) “Debate: Taking Human Rights Seriously”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 20, pp. 119-130.

  5. Igor Primoratz (2002) “Michael Walzer’s Just war theory: Some issues of responsibility”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5, pp. 221–243.

  6. John Stuart Mill (2006) "A Few Words on Non-Intervention". New England Review (1990-), 27(3), 252–264.

  7. Kritsiotis, Dino (2012) "Humanitarian Intervention". In obo in International Law,

    https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-978019 9796953-0021.xml (accessed 23 Aug. 2022).

  8. Michael Walzer (1980) "The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics", Philosophy & Public Affairs, 9(3), 209–229.

  9. Ramesh Thakur. (2002) “Intervention, Sovereignty and the Responsibility to Protect: Experiences from ICISS”, Security Dialogue, 33(3), 323–340.

  10. Tesón, Fernando R. (2017) “Further Issues in Humanitarian Intervention”, Debating Humanitarian Intervention: Should We Try to Save Strangers?, Debating Ethics (New York, 2018; online edn), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190202903.003.0006 ( accessed 16 Aug. 2022)

  11. Tesón, Fernando R. (2017) “Humanitarian Intervention as Defense of Persons”, Debating Humanitarian Intervention: Should We Try to Save Strangers?, Debating Ethics (New York, 2018; online edn), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190202903.003.0002, accessed 10 Sept. 2022.

  12. Tesón, Fernando R. “The Mystery of Territory,” Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (2015): 25.

  13. Tesón, Fernando R (2017) “Why Sovereignty (Still) Matters”, Debating Humanitarian Intervention: Should We Try to Save Strangers?, Debating Ethics (New York, 2018; online edn), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190202903.003.0010, accessed 12 Aug. 2022.

  14. Walling, Carrie Booth (2015) “Human Rights Norms, State Sovereignty, and Humanitarian Intervention.” Human Rights Quarterly 37, no. 2: 383–413.